This
past Sunday, four members of the WRA Girls' Track & Field team did something
that no other girls' track group had done before: they competed in the Indoor
High School meet hosted by Kent State University. Hoping to test the training
they have endured with Geno since just before the holiday Break in December and
simply to get some competition under their belts before our competitive season
begins, these girls -- co-captain Tricia Cunningham in the 200m, Wade-Watta
Kamara in the 400m, Nina Tekelenburg in the mile (a completely new distance for
her), and Sophie Arzberger in the high jump -- joined for a 7:45 team breakfast
before their 8:15 departure to brave the elements en route to the KSU Field
House. It was the last of three such meets and it turned out to be the final
opportunity for most of the high schoolers competing there to notch a
performance that might qualify them for the State Indoor Championships, which
occur next weekend. As a result, there were literally hundreds of entries in
numerous events -- 60m dash; 60m hurdles; 200m; 400m. Just counting the girls'
events, there were 18 heats of the 60m dash; 20 heats of the hurdles, 21 of the
200m and 14 of the 400m. This made for an incredibly long wait for each of
their events. Thankfully, each girl was entered in an event that did not
require prelims or semi-finals; otherwise, this story would actually encompass
an even longer day. In fact, this meet in previous years was a two-day affair;
however, since KSU had to host the MAC indoor championship meet on this same
weekend this year, the high school meet was condensed to a single very long
day. What is more, with so many heats – that were not known until just before
the event, it was quite difficult to execute a proper warm-up strategy with
regard to the progression of the finals in each event.
Despite
it all, it was a tremendous experience for the Lady Pioneers, and for all
except Wade-Watta, it was their first indoor meet ever; for all, it would be
the first time running on such an odd-sized track -- 292 meters instead of the
usual 200m ovals that predominate the indoor facilities around the country.
Incidentally, there are even several 300 meter indoor tracks; however, 292
meters is an odd configuration, indeed. And while that made it all the more
interesting, it also rendered a coach's task of getting interval split times
that were anywhere near accurate nearly impossible. Let that fact serve as a
quasi-disclaimer for the "guesstimated" splits for Nina's mile.
Sophie
actually got it all started for us with her performance in the high jump, which
began over an hour later than the program had originally indicated. Entering at
4' 7" (instead of 4' 3", where the competition began), she cleared
the first two heights (4' 7" and 4' 9") cleanly on her first
attempts. As the bar moved up to 4' 11", she needed all three jumps to make
the clearance. And though she had three close attempts at 5' 1", she had
to bow out at that height, finishing in 10th place among 25 jumpers
(actually in a 6-way tie for 5th). Interestingly enough, Sophie had
a goal to clear 5' today, and given the nice clearances she had at the previous
heights and the closeness of her attempts at 5' 1", it is almost safe to
assume that she might have made 5', had the bar been placed there after 4'
11". Nonetheless, her jump of 4'11" is the highest jump we have had
among the girls in well over 7 years, and signs are that she will jump even
higher once our outdoor season is underway.
Next
was Nina in the third of 5 heats in the mile.
Let’s bear in mind that this is Nina’s first foray into track itself,
and although she has worked with the mile before in cross country (the mile is
not an event in the track season for us), she, too, had never dealt with a 292
meter oval. At any rate, she handled the novelty (all aspects of it) of the
race quite well. In fact, her time of 6:07.2 at a distance that is a bit longer
than the 1600m was three seconds faster than the time trial she had posted in
the 1600 a week ago. This was a revealing performance for her, to say the
least, especially as it points toward even faster times this spring.
Wade-Watta,
after multiple warm-ups and sessions of stretching, finally lined up for her
heat of the 400. I actually do not recall which heat or how many heats there
were in total; there were over 100 participants in all with a max of 6 per
heat. Starting in a weird spot on the track (to account for the 292m oval), she
powered away to a strong 1st 200m and held on to post a finishing
time of 62.3, which was 1.5 seconds faster than her time trial last week. This,
too, is promising, for once we return to the standard 400m track where she will
be able to execute the different phases of the run, Wade-Watta will be looking
at this time through her rear-view mirror.
Lastly,
our co-captain Tricia, who had the longest time to wait for the shortest race,
took to the track at well after 5pm in heat 10 of 21 in the 200 meter dash.
Suffering through the same warm-up frustrations as Wade-Watta, Tricia was
actually ecstatic to run and have at it.
In fact, I would venture a wager that her relief at finally being at the
start line far exceeded the nervousness that accompanies most sprinters,
especially when they have had to watch and hear the blistering times of so many
others in the previous nine heats. Fortunately, the 200m is a race that
involves very simple strategy: run fast;
then keep on running fast until you have to stop. Being out in the last lane,
however, is a bit daunting for even the elite runners in our sport. You are the target for everyone else, while
you, on the other hand, have no one to use as a gauge of where you are in the
race. That aside, Tricia pushed herself around what was an inordinately long
turn to finish in 30.1, slightly faster than her opening 200 in our season
opener (Longstreth) last year. Once
again, her performance affords an optimistic lens through which to prepare for
the competitive outdoor season this year.
In
sum, I could not be prouder of these ladies – surely for the great sacrifice of
time and the eagerness to enter this meet, but most importantly for their
overall sacrifice of time this winter to put in the sweat and work in hopes of
entering our season with a sharper edge. Their results at this meet give ample
validation to their hard work, and I hope that it fills them with as much
excitement and optimism for our season that it does me. They, in particular, and we, as a team, are
all the better for their efforts; and for that, they deserve a very hearty
Thank-you from all of us.